Blog essay
I had the idea of blogging with a specific project in mind when I started this project. The university smiling experiment got off to a fast start, but it didn’t take too long for people to stop contributing to the project and, just as quickly as it started, it ended. After what I might have considered a failed experiment (save I didn’t really care all that much about whether people smiled on campus or not) I choose to let the blog do what it wanted too, or rather, I didn’t try to have much of a purpose with it at all, considering I had no idea what I would want to write about on a regular basis. I found myself writing about personal thoughts a lot more than I thought I would when this project started. Some have made comments that blogging can be a little like therapy sometimes. While I didn’t find blogging very therapeutic in my own case, I could see why people might feel this way.
While writing my own blog, I found myself reading other’s blogs and I though it was interesting to see how much of my own blogging was reflective of other people’s. Whether it was responding to what they were blogging about, or if it was just an idea that was sparked by their words, my own blogging ideas sometimes were instigated by others. I don’t think this was so much of a problem, but while reading some of my own blogs I am wondering if my readers might be a bit confused as to where some of my ideas and thoughts originate. I had to remember sometimes that not everyone had read the same blogs I had, and were likely not aware of what I was referring to when I discussed “such and such’s” blog.
Keeping a regular schedule for blogging was an interesting aspect of this project. I keep a couple of blogs and sometimes I would forget which blog I had actually posted to and which one I had not. Later in the process I thought that if I could remember to keep a regular schedule that I would be able to remember which blog I had done and which one I had not. But, even while considering this, I found that as far as writing, and what I had to writing in the course of my school work, blogging probable had the lowest priority. I knew it was part of a semester long project, but it didn’t draw the significance or importance of other, paper based assignments, and when I did blog, I did not feel I was taking it as seriously as other assignments.
While I experimented with blogging I found myself second guessing a lot of what I was writing. It was hard to keep from writing anything to personal, while at the same time I was trying to convey an interesting point that I thought would be interesting to write about. I recall reading a blog entry (of an author not in 444) which described a family problem, which they did not identify because of the nature of the problem, but went on to say it was a serious problem which might involve legal authorities, and she continued to mention who the participants of this problem were and all sorts of other finer details, none of which I think should have been for public viewing. While nothing I blogged about for this class had any of the heavy connotations that this author’s writing had, I did evaluate what I was writing much more critically then I would had I not read her blog.
Moving from paper to screen as the primary source of writing has been an interesting experience indeed. Observing my own writing, and observing others writing, I have noticed that the amount of actual text seems to be significantly less than what would be written on paper. This is not only based on what I have seen from less experienced bloggers, but from those who would be considered professional writers. I have also noticed that while there is not much text on a given subject by an author, there are considerably more topics being discussed. More news organizations have taken to blogging for short quips about news and events around the world, but most of these blog entries are less than three-hundred words and they barely touch on the significance of the news they are “reporting.” I thought this was an interesting aspect of blogging, that even thought there is a significant amount more of information and news being discussed, there is little discussion or interpretation of the news that there once was. In ENG 517 there was a discussion of the move from print newspapers to web based news. One observation the class made was that there was a noticeable difference in the amount of text written in newspapers verses web sites. While doing this project, I started to wonder if the amount of news dissemination was further being limited by the use of blogs as news sources.
I also read a lot of blogs which were allegedly from overseas in hot spots such as
While I see the value in blogging I am still filled with a certain amount of skepticism. Certain blogs I have read for entertainment, which I do not hold much as far as accountability, but when I read blogs which portray a certain stance or affiliation I have to wonder about who is writing it and what their motivations are. Blogging, and being able to publish at will, is somewhat a blessing and a curse. One reason publishers exist is to weed out the material which is not fit to be published (at least reputable publishers do this.) With blogging, there is little that can be done to validate the author of the blog. Should someone claim they are somebody they are not, it would be hard to contradict them. If, in their blog, they said they had just returned from a CIA mission in
I intend to use blogging in my own future writing classes as I think it is a great way to introduce writers to an authentically public audience, but I intend to emphasize that blogging and writing for the World Wide Web can be a double edged sword. While reading a lot of these blogs I found I was becoming much more critical of what I was reading, and hence, even a bit cynical. I will have to be aware of this cynicism which teaching, but I still think blogging is a fascinating writing tool and I look forward to researching and experimenting more, but this project has brought more problematic questions rather than enlightening ones.
